Predatory Journals and Conferences Guide

Publisher & Journal Reputation

The first step to checking a journal can be a simple online search to see what has been written about it. If you don't get any good results one tip is to search for the publisher's name rather than the individual journal's. Many predatory journals are run by companies that publish a number of journals. The particular title you're looking for might not have existed for long enough to gain a reputation, but the publisher itself may have had questions and complaints going way back. Some of the most infamous predatory publishers even have entries in Wikipedia. See Science Publishing Group and OMICS.

Professional organisations that screen for predatory publishers

A good reputation is important for scientific journals. A journal with a good reputation attracts more researchers interested in submitting good-quality manuscripts, and in the long run that leads to more readers and a higher profile in the field. To safeguard their good names, legitimate journals have created a number of professional organisations for journals that meet certain requirements and follow the organisation guidelines:

• Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
• Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
• ​Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)
• World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)

These four organisations have developed "Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing" where they describe the baseline criteria required for membership.

It's worth to keep in mind that a journal or publisher doesn't have to be predatory simply because it is not part of any of these organisations. But it is a sign that one should be slightly wary of them, and spend more time investigating the journal - or contact the library for help to look into them.