Gå till huvudinnehållet
Banner Image Högskolan i Borås Bibliotekets ämnesguider Image Map

Predatory Journals and Conferences Guide

A guide on things to consider in the journal and conference selection process.

Invitation & Call for Papers

Call for papers see to arrive daily in your inbox, leaving it up to you to decide whether they are from a reliable or a predatory journal. It’s often pretty clear that the invitations are from predatory journals: they invite you to journals outside of your field, use ridiculously supercilious language, and send their messages from free email providers like Gmail, Yahoo or Hotmail.

Established journals can also send out call for papers, but they usually do so from e-mail addresses clearly affiliated with the journal in question. They also use mailing lists that you have chosen to subscribe to instead of contacting you directly at the e-mail address listed on your university’s webpages.

Invitations to publish can come from journals of varying quality, but is often spam from predatory journals. You may receive targeted mail that references your previous publications. This is something that legitimate journals do as well, which can make it difficult to tell who the sender is. There are many ways of telling what kind of journal has sent the invitation. Even though it can be flattering to hear that you have been chosen, and that your research is exactly what the journal is looking to publish you should unfortunately be careful with those kind of invitations.

Questions to check if you are being targetted by a predatory publisher

  • Have you gotten the same e-mail multiple times?
    Predatory publishers like to spam you, hoping to make you give in and submit your manuscript.
  • Does the journal's name make sense?
    Predator journals often have very broad names to cover as many areas of research as possible, whereas legitimate journals tend to be very specific. International Journal of Advanced Research and International Journal of Development Research are two examples of predatory journal titles.
  • Does the journal's scope seem like a good fit for your research?
    Spam from predatory publishers often invite you to publish outside of your field of expertise. A typical sign that you have received spam from a predatory publisher is that your colleagues receive the same invitation as you do, even though you are active in different fields. 
  • Language: generic or overly familiar?
    If a call for papers is written in a very generic way it can be a sign that it is spam from a predatory journal. On the other hand, predatory journals can go to extremes in the other direction, and send you emails written in such familiar language that it feels very unprofessional. 
  • Poorly written invitations?
    If the email you get is poorly written, with typos or grammatical errors you can be fairly certain it doesn't come from a legitimate journal. 
  • Does the invite reference an impact factor?
    If so, try and find out if it is actually Clarivate Analytic's trademarked Journal Impact Factor, or something less reliable. Predatory publishers like to use nonsense indicators like "Science Central Score" and "SJIFfactor". Read more about impact factors and predatory publishers here.
  • Is the e-mail signed by a named person?
    If the call for papers is unsigned, or signed by e.g. "The Editor" that is a sign that the sender isn't legitimate. You can also find examples of spam from predatory publishers where the signature is written in different colors and styles. This is another sign that the sender is unprofessional.
  • Are there clear contact details?
    Make sure that the sender address matches the e-mail given in the contact information. If they are different it could be a sign that something isn't right. The same thing goes for call for papers sent from generic e-mail providers like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail. Legitimate journals have their own e-mail domains, or editors that use their university affiliated addresses to contact authors.

 

Below you can find example call for papers. There are issues with each of them that makes it possible the sender is a predatory journal. It's also possible that the journal is legitimate, but of poor quality. Either way it is never a good idea to publish in dubious journals.

Examples: Call for papers

1) The journal isn't indexed in any databases relevant for engineers. It is not in Ulrichsweb at all.

2) Ebsco host is a collection of databases covering different areas. In this call for papers it is unclear which of those Ebsco databases the journal is supposedly indexed in.

3) The last submission date is February 25th. The papers will be published March 5th. Will there be time for a rigorous round of peer review in that time?

1) The title of this journal should make you suspicious: International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal.

2) SJIF isn't a widely used journal metric.

3) What does "double-reviewed" mean?

4) The area they target in the call for papers is very broad.

1) The journal apparently publishes articles in the fields of "...Astronomy and astrophysics, Chemistry, Earth and atmospheric sciences, Physics, Biology in general, Agriculture, Biophysics and biochemistry, Botany, Environmental Science, Forestry, Genetics, Horticulture, Husbandry, Neuroscience, Zoology, Computer science, Engineering, Robotics and Automation, Materials science, Mathematics, Mechanics, MIS, Statistics, Health Care & Public Health, Nutrition and Food Science, Pharmaceutical Sciences, and so on..."
There are specific journals for all of these fields. Why publish in this generic one instead?

2) DOAJ is not an indexing service, but a list of journals and articles. 

3) Index Copernicus International (ICI) isn't very well regarded. And as if that wasn't enough, this journal isn't even listed in ICI.

4) The journal says they will be indexed in "ISI". This is the former name of Web of Science. Why not use the current name?

5) The journal says articles will be peer reviewed within a month. Is it reasonable to expect the process with review and all changes to be made in such a short time?

1) Does this look suspiciously like previous call for papers? It's the same publisher. The journal's title is very broad. What research wouldn't fit into a journal that publishes "Contemporary Research" and manages to be both American and international?

2) The journal covers a lot of different scientific fields.

3) This journal is also indexed in Index Copernicus International (ICI). Even if it is a real database doesn't mean it is relevant for you.

4) EBSCO and Gale have many different databases in many different fields. The journal should know the specific database it is indexed in.

1) This call for papers has hardly any relevant information at all.

2) The invitation isn't signed by any named person.

1) The journal has a broad scope: "all areas of education".

2) The journal reviews all different kinds of articles within one week.

3) The journal wants you to give up the copyright to your article. Legitimate open access very rarely ask you to sign a copyright transfer agreement.

4) The journal publishes articles so quickly it's dubious that they have the time to do any proper peer review.

Make sure the invitation or call for papers meets the following requirements:

  • Good language
  • Professional appearance
  • Relevant to your research
  • Reasonable timeline to publish
  • Named sender

I have sent a manuscript to a predatory journal!

Contact the journal and withdraw your manuscript! The faster you do this the better, it is easier to withdraw the manuscript before it has been accepted. You don't need to state any reason, however, if you want to, you can say that you found errors in the manuscript.